The petitioner sought the cancellation of a young for putting in h2o supply on lands allegedly belonging to him and his forefathers. The courtroom emphasized the need to the petitioner to have locus standi as an “aggrieved person” in constitutional jurisdiction scenarios. Correction of Entries: The courts have affirmed that https://emiliodoezo.win-blog.com/9814541/5-simple-statements-about-best-damages-advocate-in-karachi-explained